The team behind every suplements.store review

The editorial team operates in three role groups. The same person never occupies more than one role on a single review.

• Researchers. Read the manufacturer page, label, refund policy, GMP attestation, and any peer-reviewed studies referenced for each disclosed ingredient. Build the four-screen audit dossier (official source, ingredient transparency, GMP facility, refund-window honesty).
• Writers. Translate the research dossier into a buyer- guide that frames realistic timelines, lifestyle pairing, and known tradeoffs. Writers do not see commission rates for the product they are writing about.
• Reviewers. Independently re-check every claim in the draft against the source materials, flag any over-statement, and approve publication. Reviewers can downgrade or block any review regardless of revenue impact.

The editorial team draws on backgrounds across consumer health journalism, nutrition writing, supplement-industry research, and direct-to-consumer offer auditing. Specific staff bios are not published individually because most team members also work on other consumer-research outlets and prefer outlet-level attribution.

Where individual expertise materially affects a specific review (for example, when a category requires unusually careful framing around medication interactions), the role of the contributing reviewer is noted in the review itself.

We are not licensed medical professionals. Our coverage is consumer research and editorial guidance — not medical advice. Readers should consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen, especially when pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or managing a medical condition.

Ingredient discussions on suplements.store cite primary sources hosted on the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and PubMed. Where a category-specific study set is referenced, the linked sources appear at the bottom of the relevant category guide and per-product review.

We do not cite manufacturer-funded white papers or testimonial-only blog posts as evidence. We do not cite our own previously-published reviews as evidence for new reviews.

suplements.store earns commission when readers purchase through affiliate links on this site. To keep commission opportunities from quietly bending reviews, the editorial process is structured so that:

• Writers do not know the commission rate for the product they are currently writing about.
• The four-screen audit is applied before any commission discussion happens. Products that fail any screen are dropped regardless of payout potential.
• Reviewers can downgrade a rating, demote a product within its category comparison, or block publication entirely. Reviewer decisions are not overruled by revenue concerns.
• The affiliate disclosure on every page is the same regardless of the specific commission rate — we never label a higher-paying offer as a better product solely because it pays more.

For factual corrections on any review, see our contact page. For a full description of the four-screen audit we apply to every product before publication, see our editorial methodology.

Brand owners with concerns about how their product is described can also use the contact page. We review the feedback against our methodology and the public-source evidence we relied on for the original review.